From owner-freebsd-isp  Mon Jul 22 08:25:21 1996
Return-Path: owner-isp
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA12055
          for isp-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 08:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tombstone.sunrem.com (tombstone.sunrem.com [206.81.134.54])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA12048
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 08:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from brandon@localhost) by tombstone.sunrem.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA14750; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 09:24:59 -0600
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 09:24:58 -0600 (MDT)
From: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@tombstone.sunrem.com>
To: Glen Foster <gfoster@gfoster.com>
cc: robert@chalmers.com.au, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Virtual domains?
In-Reply-To: <199607221102.HAA05277@tbd.gfoster.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960722092410.14703L-100000@tombstone.sunrem.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 22 Jul 1996, Glen Foster wrote:
> This may not be as important a feature any more as the latest Apache
> release (1.1.1) no longer needs it to support virtual hosts, see
> http://www.apache.org/, and other web servers (are there any? :-) will
> undoubtedly adopt similar functionality.

This only works if the client provides data on the host it thought it was 
going to.  I dont recall the HTTP spec at the moment, but I thought this
was not a required action.