From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 21 15:57:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B0D5EF4 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x230.google.com (mail-qa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAC0F2DA1 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x12so4153410qac.21 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 08:57:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=UceZXmUbIMNWJebzIuMr5/Sip+orZq7z6oAk1oXdO6o=; b=hQrkoEW+DX/Jvl+wjAjud/IyOEwwnH+w1T0gmBMtH/csZI0zsQMX7KfTVv2K41LAwD Fs2XlNtE7JXMG4UdbTR6LzbcnM1rniosGywnAH8VrEC2Qi8Qy8eDVniAI9k6kY878LrC NMbDceiVmM14R3KcEcdIJxUrUtTtnfQ/3nZNc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=UceZXmUbIMNWJebzIuMr5/Sip+orZq7z6oAk1oXdO6o=; b=MhByEc85PVvlCogICpGKhF6ASSmo281zZkuRThQtimXiNlY9ddfHdcGxeqjINFSQMz k7bjEXBDMrm9bw7JZ77PiglYrHGpLmoyFmk3dvSSs0AC4mOEcL+vdZn+RcAa6QspHQG/ 8raCIGOQfL92t0NMBbDNqwM5Fx0jbUVYcW5KZ385yJIJqyrBAMlRZJST1B6vnonF4z7k LS1JY04qn0gc0lDYCpyrI0EbInL/iAG5DJ6XsHgb2PYNLvJ16ZD0LR4Z+oaPFQXglvzB hdBENQJRyf9NzwwWJfgt/Bb3GsILJkTLgHBllBjQz6Lkj13tNTwQpoaheJJdksQi2A+d J62g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkfaG6J4d4JniIb/hfiuRhQkgsKyRShgQKw4zNfOglh3auZSbUXHS9MmXxNl8EGsTWVxFl4 X-Received: by 10.224.135.132 with SMTP id n4mr16515923qat.23.1403366274892; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 08:57:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lists@eitanadler.com Received: by 10.96.222.131 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 08:57:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201406211423.s5LENFt4010937@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201406211423.s5LENFt4010937@svn.freebsd.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 08:57:24 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2Tyj_KcJnWG279qtjvh00C3DTdM Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r358704 - head/Mk To: Adam Weinberger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:57:56 -0000 On 21 June 2014 07:23, Adam Weinberger wrote: > Author: adamw > Date: Sat Jun 21 14:23:15 2014 > New Revision: 358704 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/358704 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r358704/ > > Log: > Improve the clarity of a few descriptions that became less accurate by > overspecificity. If the options can't be specific they should not be shared > Modified: > head/Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk > > -GHOSTSCRIPT_DESC?= Ghostscript PDF support > +GHOSTSCRIPT_DESC?= Ghostscript support This description is now meaningless. Can you propose a better alternative? > -LDAP_DESC?= LDAP authentication support > +LDAP_DESC?= LDAP protocol support What functionality might i gain or lose if I turn this on/off? LDAP should likely not be a shared description at all. -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams