Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:20:55 -0800 From: David Brodbeck <gull@gull.us> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? Message-ID: <AANLkTi=U0t92qH1d7MEYD3DKCe9hN4KKmpffpw_o4dM4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20101217160221.GB94970@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> <AANLkTimYKW=xOrVivx5okwaWrm5AWb-Y8c2KsZbMAA%2B_@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTiks9ze649-41X-MVryu_pHdy7uHQyvSzi8Yef_G@mail.gmail.com> <20101217152709.GE94554@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <4D0B84F5.4010905@unsane.co.uk> <20101217160221.GB94970@gizmo.acns.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@msu.edu> wrote: > Anyway, SeLinux ain't 100% popular over there I noticed. > Maybe it is just a matter of getting used to it. =A0I got > tired of reading the posts on it, so haven't figured out > if they were substantive or just whiney. The problem with SELinux is it becomes very difficult to configure properly if you don't have a normal, out-of-the-box configuration. For example, I never did figure out how to keep it from blocking an rsync backup. I disabled it after that, because a system I can't back up is pretty useless no matter how secure it is. :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=U0t92qH1d7MEYD3DKCe9hN4KKmpffpw_o4dM4>