From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 19 20:08:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E1010656C4 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:08:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from makc@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.issp.ac.ru (mail.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DB58FC22 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 84-83.pptp.artx.ru [62.63.83.84:11239] (HELO/EHLO luna.dio.ru, authenticated with PLAIN) by mail.issp.ac.ru with ESMTP/inet id nBJJV51V000871 (using TLSv1/SSLv3, with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits), verified NO) Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:31:05 +0300 (MSK) From: Max Brazhnikov To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:29:56 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-STABLE; KDE/4.3.4; i386; ; ) References: <200912191836.nBJIaNRP005719@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200912191836.nBJIaNRP005719@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200912192229.56517.makc@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.3]); Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:31:05 +0300 (MSK) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.1/10201/Sat Dec 19 16:57:03 2009 on mail.issp.ac.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: dsh@wizard.volgograd.ru Subject: Re: ports/141781: [PATCH] x11-drivers/xf86-input-synaptics: update to 1.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:08:06 -0000 On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:36:23 GMT, miwi@freebsd.org wrote: > Synopsis: [PATCH] x11-drivers/xf86-input-synaptics: update to 1.2.1 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: miwi > State-Changed-When: Sat Dec 19 18:36:23 UTC 2009 > State-Changed-Why: > we working on a big xorg update. Thanks for your submission. Why not to mark this (and other related to xorg) as patched or analyzed instead of closed?