From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 17:43:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44A11065673 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:43:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [212.34.63.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD578FC12 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:43:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from dhcp250-188.yandex.ru ([87.250.250.188]) by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x) id 1LM3eJ-000DHG-5J; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:58:55 +0300 Message-ID: <496A254F.2020500@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:58:55 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru References: <49695A15.8010801@psg.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Randy Bush , Boris Kovalenko , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: quagga-0.99.11_1 is marked as broken: does not build. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:43:53 -0000 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Randy, good day. > > Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:31:49AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: >> 8-current amd64 a few days old >> "quagga-0.99.11_1 is marked as broken: does not build." >> >> yikes! darned tough to build a router (sorry folk, i need is-is). >> >> clue bat, hack, pixie dust, please. > > Please, try patches from the > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-December/001443.html > and > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-December/001474.html > > And please, report any results back ;)) The fix is already in the port: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net/quagga/files/patch-zebra-kernel_socket.c?rev=1.5 I have no idea why Erwin has marked it as BROKEN again. -- Dixi. Sem.