From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Oct  9 17:10:41 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA21182
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 9 Oct 1996 17:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from admin.cyberenet.net (root@admin.cyberenet.net [204.213.252.6])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA21168
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 1996 17:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: wb2oyc@cyberenet.net
Received: from ux1.cyberenet.net by admin.cyberenet.net with smtp
	(Smail3.1.29.1 #7) id m0vB8gf-000O4eC; Wed, 9 Oct 96 20:09 EDT
Received: from wb2oyc.ppp.cyberenet.net by ux1.cyberenet.net with smtp
	(Smail3.1.29.1 #8) id m0vB8ge-0006FKC; Wed, 9 Oct 96 20:09 EDT
Message-ID: <XFMail.961009195733.wb2oyc@cyberenet.net>
X-Mailer: XFMail 0.4 [p0] on Linux
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.94.961008205711.2709Q-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 1996 19:42:36 -0400 (EDT)
To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu
Subject: Re: minicom
Cc: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>, questions@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On 00:58:38 Doug White wrote:
>>On Tue, 8 Oct 1996 wb2oyc@cyberenet.net wrote:
>
>Use seyon.  I guess it depends on how accurate you consider xterm to be as
>an vt100 emulator :-)
>
Well, for starters, I never said xterm was or even attempted to emulate a vt100.
It doesn't.  An RXVT does; or its supposed to anyway.  On Linux, it does.  On
FreeBSD, it does not.  Guess thats another hack, huh?  What I need is an 
accurate emulation, or it does me no good at all.

Paul