From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar  2 09:20:36 2012
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C264106564A;
	Fri,  2 Mar 2012 09:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25ADA8FC08;
	Fri,  2 Mar 2012 09:20:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bender.solomo.local (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q229KYu9081733;
	Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:20:35 GMT (envelope-from flo@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <4F5090E2.7000604@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:20:34 +0100
From: Florian Smeets <flo@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120217 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
References: <201202272335.q1RNZBJc081428@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4F508F9C.5040505@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F508F9C.5040505@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/ca_root_nss Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 09:20:36 -0000

On 02.03.2012 10:15, Doug Barton wrote:
> Would '${LN} -sf' have been a safer choice?

Why safer? What if someone has a link pointing to another cert file? 
${LN} -sf would just overwrite it. Now we only create the link if it's 
not there. IMHO the safest choice for all cases, no?

Florian

>
>
> On 02/27/2012 15:35, Florian Smeets wrote:
>> flo         2012-02-27 23:35:11 UTC
>>
>>    FreeBSD ports repository
>>
>>    Modified files:
>>      security/ca_root_nss Makefile
>>    Log:
>>    make sure installation does not fail if for whatever reason the symlink in
>>    /etc/ssl is still there on (re)install phase with ETCSYMLINK option set.
>>
>>    Submitted by:   mi
>>
>>    Revision  Changes    Path
>>    1.19      +2 -1      ports/security/ca_root_nss/Makefile
>>
>> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/ca_root_nss/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.18&r2=1.19&f=u
>>
>
>