From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 22 09:20:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D1516A420; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:20:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EAA43D55; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:20:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1EpMcQ-000EpI-Sr; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:20:14 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman In-Reply-To: Message from Brian Fundakowski Feldman of "Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:40:57 EST." <20051221214057.GE35080@green.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:20:14 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em bad performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:20:16 -0000 > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:55:29PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > hi, > > this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, > > one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is > > a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). > > > > the em performance under 6.0-stable is half of any other box i have, > > and a similar mb running linux gives about 1GB, so > > > > Q: any ideas what can be wrong? > > Performance of what? Do you even have a correct MTU set? wish it was that simple :-), everything is standard. and it's not specific to one box, i have 3 of these with the same slowness. danny