From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 18 11:52:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E7B16A4D4; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:52:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.Awfulhak.org (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [80.177.173.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC1343D5A; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:52:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from dev.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.5]) by gw.Awfulhak.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0IBq9rN037898; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:52:09 GMT (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:52:08 +0000 From: Brian Somers To: John-Mark Gurney Message-ID: <20050118115208.4dccf9f4@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: <20050118070228.GR19624@funkthat.com> References: <200501050006.j0506FvV057370@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050105001620.GZ19624@funkthat.com> <20050115232853.P1020@odysseus.silby.com> <20050118021700.3b0b6e33@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> <20050118070228.GR19624@funkthat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on gw.lan.Awfulhak.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Mike Silbersack cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Olivier Houchard cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/re if_re.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:52:24 -0000 On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:02:28 -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Brian Somers wrote this message on Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 02:17 +0000: > > With HW checksumming enabled they not only got the odd checksum wrong > > (we can all deal with that!), but on occasion they *truncated* packets > > by 1-3 bytes and then checksummed them - in a repeatable way!! > > Did you try with a recent driver? There was a major bug where we were > not aligning the receive buffers properly which was causing some wierd > issues... I'll have a look. I *think* I got the cards after those issues were fixed, but I can't be sure as I can't find any of the mails we exchanged at the time... Cheers. -- Brian Somers Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !