From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 30 18:25:59 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id SAA11924 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 18:25:59 -0700 Received: from wdl1.wdl.loral.com (wdl1.wdl.loral.com [137.249.32.1]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA11914 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 18:25:53 -0700 Received: from miles.sso.loral.com (miles.wdl.loral.com) by wdl1.wdl.loral.com (5.x/WDL-2.4-1.0) id AA23155; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 18:25:16 -0700 Received: by miles.sso.loral.com (4.1/SSO-SUN-2.04) id AA26411; Wed, 30 Aug 95 21:25:18 EDT Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 21:25:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Richard Toren X-Sender: rpt@miles To: hackers Subject: rplay..my mistake(sortof) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I got misplaced in my search for rplay. There is a 3.2.0b3.tar.gz in the distfile directory, but no 3.2.0b2.tar.gz. There is a rplay in /packages/All which I assume is only if running -current. There is a rplay in /packages-2.0/All There is no rplay in packages-2.0.5/All My comments concerning less tha guru users and confusion stand. Is thia a marketing issue? Can I run tha 2.0 package on 2.0.5, or was it not included for a compatability reason? ==================================================== Rip Toren | The bad news is that C++ is not an object-oriented | rpt@miles.sso.loral.com | programming language. .... The good news is that | | C++ supports object-oriented programming. | | C++ Programming & Fundamental Concepts | | by Anderson & Heinze | ====================================================