Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:45:28 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: proper way to handle ports dependencies ? Message-ID: <1170441928.33849.9.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20070202092701.A97555@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20070202092701.A97555@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-d2ekyubb84qdAMd72UQD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Luigi Rizzo p=ED=B9e v p=E1 02. 02. 2007 v 09:27 -0800:
> I have some ports (linux-gspca-kmod, linux-ov511-kmod, more in the
> future) which depend on linux-kmod-devel which in turn only works
> on i386 and 6.2 or above.
>=20
> Is it enough to put ONLY_FOR_ARCHS and .if ${OSVERSION} < ...
> just in the parent (linux-kmod-devel), or should i
> put it in all children too ?
Technically it's enough to put it in the parent port, but it's a service
to the users to put it everywhere, so the process bails out earlier.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Do not meddle in the affairs of Wizards, for they are subtle and
quick to anger.
--=-d2ekyubb84qdAMd72UQD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBFw4bIntdYP8FOsoIRAuy2AKCZJGXj99N5Xtbacf1kcQ8d5qoqUACgv968
Hf0Ur9NCgLtRU3HCuyavFgI=
=EgW9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-d2ekyubb84qdAMd72UQD--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1170441928.33849.9.camel>