From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 19:47:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE4E106566B for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:47:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from mail.irbisnet.ru (mail.irbisnet.ru [194.186.18.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EF88FC23 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:47:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([85.172.11.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.irbisnet.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5HJlOQQ010669; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:47:36 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Message-ID: <485814C2.9030204@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:47:14 +0400 From: Yuri Pankov User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The MadDaemon References: <6c1774c50806171211g147f41ahb5e2edf0334dad93@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6c1774c50806171211g147f41ahb5e2edf0334dad93@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: Dual NIC routing (?) problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:47:40 -0000 The MadDaemon wrote: > List, > > I'm having a problem with a dual-homed host running 7.0-RELEASE with > regards to traffic on one of the interfaces that I'm hoping someone > knows something about. > > The goal of this box is to run Nessus on bge0 only (which is plugged > into a trunk port on a switch), keeping fxp0 free as the admin > interface and for serving web pages on my LAN. > > Here's ifconfig: > > bge0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=9b > ether 00:19:b9:22:a8:22 > inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 0.0.0.255 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > fxp0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=b > ether 00:02:b3:bb:59:17 > inet 10.20.10.24 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.20.10.255 > inet 10.20.10.28 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.20.10.28 > inet 10.20.10.29 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.20.10.29 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > > /etc/rc.conf section: > > # Created: Mon Jun 9 09:32:52 2008 > defaultrouter="10.20.10.254" > hostname="darkhorse.mydomain.local" > ifconfig_fxp0="inet 10.20.10.24 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 10.20.10.28 netmask 255.255.255.255" > ifconfig_fxp0_alias1="inet 10.20.10.29 netmask 255.255.255.255" > ifconfig_bge0="inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0" Try using ifconfig_bge0="up" in /etc/rc.conf instead of assigning bogus (probably) address. > > I'm not sure what other changes need to be made or where, but when I > assign an IP/netmask to bge0, bring up the interface, and try to ping > the gateway (or anything else), I get 100% packet loss. I've even > tried to assign a new default route, but I get an error stating > there's already a default route. > > I know I'm completely missing something here, but I just can't figure > out *what*. > > Any help would be most appreciated. > > > -MD HTH, Yuri