From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 20 19:36:22 2015
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49F04C52;
 Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:36:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BFC575F;
 Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:36:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.23] (unknown [130.255.19.191])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAF543BAB;
 Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:36:12 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <55355524.3080907@marino.st>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 21:36:04 +0200
From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st>
Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>, 
 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
CC: "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, 
 "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>,
 "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r384106 - head/Mk/Uses
References: <201504161244.t3GCiHF4040177@svn.freebsd.org>
 <CACM2dAb1NtKU9ZGmuf94rZeHi4izJ0-=noARB3eci+KZOWCBGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150420170954.GF960@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
 <CACM2dAa4HdNZJ2VaRj1SCS+rXB2YJpPy+TVhxh-enUu-kDw7QA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACM2dAa4HdNZJ2VaRj1SCS+rXB2YJpPy+TVhxh-enUu-kDw7QA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:36:22 -0000

On 4/20/2015 21:03, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Could you point lua@ to ports@ ?  The goal really is to have a central
> place for lua ports (other than ports@).
> 
> I don't really care one way or the other, I just hate to see large
> groups of ports sit a ports@ that need coordination / standards.

I disagree with this suggestion.  In that case, lua maintenance will be
hindered by a phantom team.  People tend to avoid team ports because
there's always the fear there is some big exp-run brewing (big hidden
picture).

lua has a much better chance of being maintained as ports@ in this case,
IMO.  There won't be the uncertainty of the unknown / hand-slap.

John