From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 2 21:40:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADEE16A420; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:40:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB37843D48; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:40:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DA41A4E20; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 13:40:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D5B2052AC0; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:40:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:40:38 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Marco van de Voort Message-ID: <20060302214038.GA73259@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1491AB3E-4BA4-445E-A625-51900142534C@FreeBSD.org> <20060302212556.004DC2288F@snail.stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060302212556.004DC2288F@snail.stack.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Ade Lovett Subject: Re: gtk lib rename. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 21:40:40 -0000 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:25:56PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > Why do you need to parse them when: > >=20 > > pkg-config --cflags package > > and pkg-config --libs package > >=20 > > will do it for you? That's the whole point of those .pc files >=20 > No,=20 >=20 > Multiple reasons: [...] > Of course all this email wordplay is fun (I of course know I have a not > entirely standard port, and have practiced such discussions a lot over the > years), but I'm still wondering why there is no sane grace period of say = an > year with a couple of symlinks? It would save a lot of people a lot of > trouble, having to fix the ports at breakneck speed, decrease all breakage > with a magnitude, simply because a lot more systems will be up to speed in > an year etc. If you refuse to use the standard pkg-config method set up by the authors of the software (note: not FreeBSD), any problems that result are your own concern. Kris --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEB2ZWWry0BWjoQKURAiCoAKDTmesj0fjfjrhWAHwp4I3NR5ZkbQCghLGA zkXoLcvK5VktYPpuz+qn0v0= =mm/9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--