Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 07:07:42 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193625] www/webkit-gtk3: Update to 2.4.4, Make NLS and HTML docs conditional for multiple ports Message-ID: <bug-193625-13-wWv2KDd1MR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193625-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193625-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193625 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs-patch, needs-qa Status|Needs Triage |Open Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |gnome@FreeBSD.org |org | Summary|[change-request] |www/webkit-gtk3: Update to |webkit-gtk3 updated to |2.4.4, Make NLS and HTML |2.4.4; non-mandatory NLS |docs conditional for |and HTML docs for some |multiple ports |ports | --- Comment #5 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- Thanks for your submission Mike! Each port has a different maintainer, and several ports are affected (changed) by your patches. Each of them will need maintainer approval, so we need to do one of the following: 1) Attach each port patch as an individual and separate attachment in this issue (with a super obvious name like "category/portname" or something similar. OR 2) Create a new issue report for each port The downside of (1) is that we need to obtain approval for each one to consider this issue resolved, and all of them will need to committed together (even they don't need to be). The downside of (2) is additional overhead for you and our bug tracking/triaging team. My personal preference is for (1), so can you: - Remove the tarball attached here - Attach each of the port patches as a separate attachment. (with .diff or .patch extension) Additionally, you probably also want to use the new OPTIONS HELPER syntax everywhere you can, instead of: .if (${PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO} blah .else blah .endif See: Mk/bsd.options.mk, just under the following comment: # The following knobs are there to simplify the handling of OPTIONS in simple # cases : -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193625-13-wWv2KDd1MR>