Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:59:16 +1000 From: Timothy Mukaibo <tinkysama@mukaibo.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Subject: Re: ACPI Panic on Current, AMD64 Message-ID: <849F0899-7AD9-4D7A-B849-D7FB36CE73AE@mukaibo.com> In-Reply-To: <200905271725.44235.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <49159824-57EB-4628-9F1C-CE9243465D02@mukaibo.com> <D6210C8D-6149-45F2-89B9-82B779BD8610@mukaibo.com> <4A1D3484.9040201@icyb.net.ua> <200905271725.44235.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello guys, I'm not sure if I made this clear, but the board boots with 7.2- Stable. Have there been lots of ACPI changes between 7.2 and 8.0 that might have caused this regression? Kind regards, Timothy. On 28/05/2009, at 7:25 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 27 May 2009 8:39:32 am Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 27/05/2009 14:11 Timothy Mukaibo said the following: >>> Hello Eygene, >>> >>> I know the patch won't fix anything :( >>> >>> Here's the updated dmesg: >>> >>> acpi0: <Nvidia NVDAACPI> on motherboard >>> acpi0: [ITHREAD] >>> acpi0: Power Button (fixed) >>> acpi0: reservation of 0, a000 (3) failed >>> acpi0: reservation of 100000, bfdf0000 (3) failed >>> Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 >>> acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on >>> acpi0 >>> acip_button0: <Power Button> on acpi0 >>> pcib0: <ACPI Host-PCI bridge> port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 >>> pci0: <ACPI Host PCI bus> on pcib0 >>> pci_link26: Index IRQ Rtd Ref IRQs >>> MPASS 0 20 N 1 20 21 22 23 >>> link type is 15 >>> panic: Assertion link->l_prs_template.Type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ >>> failed at /usr/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pci_link.c:746 >> >> So resource type is ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ, but link type is >> ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ. Interesting. > > I think the _PRS returned one type and _CRS is returning another (or > some > such). I'm not sure what the "right" thing to do is in that case. > Presumably this is while building the buffer for _SRS? Hmm, I guess > you > could just make it able to read the IRQ out of the _PRS no matter > what format > it is. But we might should be copying the resource that is in _PRS > instead > and building a new resource list instead of overwriting the fields > in _CRS. > That is a bit more involved. > > -- > John Baldwin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > "
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?849F0899-7AD9-4D7A-B849-D7FB36CE73AE>