From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 11 05:54:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EBD16A40F for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 05:54:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de (antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de [134.102.176.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8374343D72 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 05:54:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from bremerhaven.ant.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.176.10]) by antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GXX37-0000ib-TY; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:54:37 +0200 Message-ID: <452C8725.3070502@ant.uni-bremen.de> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:54:45 +0200 From: Heinrich Rebehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060910 SeaMonkey/1.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric References: <20061008033805.56892.qmail@web33713.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <452C06C8.10602@mikestammer.com> In-Reply-To: <452C06C8.10602@mikestammer.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, michael graffam Subject: Re: Another whirl with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 05:54:52 -0000 Eric wrote: > michael graffam wrote: >> Hi, my name is Michael and I'm and Open Source addict. >> >> >> Enough with the re-introductions, I guess. >> Essentially, I'd like to hear any opinions regarding >> the 64 bit and 32 bit FreeBSD ports. NDIS support is >> fine on both? >> >> My machine is a Compaq Presario V2000 series, in case >> someone has the same, or similar. > > i heard its better to run the i386 version of BSD on 64 bit machines due > to the overhead, etc. unless you need what the 64 bit version gives you > (addressing more memory, etc). It will work fine (I run both versions), > but i am sure more can be turned up by a quick search of the mailing > list etc. Overhead ?? Would this mean that the 64 bit version will run slower? -- Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Department of Telecommunications - Phone : +49/421/218-4664 Fax : -3341