From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Sep 3 17:46:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FBD14A12 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 17:46:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id TAA17880; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 19:44:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from sji-ca43-43.ix.netcom.com(209.111.209.43) by dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma017866; Fri Sep 3 19:44:39 1999 Received: (from asami@localhost) by bubble.didi.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id RAA67777; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 17:44:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami) To: Ade Lovett Cc: "Justin M. Seger" , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lang/tclX75 References: <19990903154332.P9489@supernews.com> <199909032115.RAA43616@scds.com> <19990903164159.V9489@supernews.com> From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 03 Sep 1999 17:44:32 -0700 In-Reply-To: Ade Lovett's message of "Fri, 3 Sep 1999 16:41:59 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 21 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Ade Lovett Are you guys alternating between private and -ports messages? After Justin's first message I only see Ade talking. * In particular: * * "Since 8.2 fixes many bugs that are found in 8.1 and is * basically identical to 8.1 for script writers, we recommend * that everyone use 8.2 in preference to 8.1" That sounds fine. * I'll work on getting those ports that use tcl < 8.1 up to 8.1, though * it might be time for a tcl82 and tk82 port (haven't checked to see * if there's a tclX82 -- I know there's a tclX81 though). Ok. Please let me know when the tcl/tk82 ports are ready, and I'll do a repository copy. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message