From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Dec 17 14:55:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DF2C84C88 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 14:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.com (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B013E17C5; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 14:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ip72-204-83-236.fv.ks.cox.net [72.204.83.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D7343C0B; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 08:54:19 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: The ports collection has some serious issues To: Michael Gmelin , Alphons van Werven References: <192c99ca-ed3b-44da-633a-99629fdcea70@marino.st> <20161217132608.GA1352@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <54CEEF4F-3E62-45D1-902A-DA4372E9F060@freebsd.org> Cc: tingox@gmail.com, FreeBSD Mailing List Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org From: John Marino Message-ID: <0f993f23-0029-6c21-d42b-7109141f98b6@marino.st> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 08:55:28 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <54CEEF4F-3E62-45D1-902A-DA4372E9F060@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 161217-0, 12/17/2016), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 14:55:31 -0000 On 12/17/2016 07:55, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > >> On 17 Dec 2016, at 14:26, Alphons van Werven wrote: >> >> John Marino wrote: >> >>> In fact, anyone that updates ports should use either poudriere testport >>> or synth test. >> >> Then consider these relinquished: >> >> /usr/ports/archivers/zip >> /usr/ports/astro/wmmoonclock >> /usr/ports/astro/xearth >> /usr/ports/devel/byaccj >> /usr/ports/devel/csmith >> /usr/ports/devel/gzstream >> /usr/ports/devel/t1lib >> /usr/ports/games/xroach >> /usr/ports/games/xteddy >> /usr/ports/graphics/hsetroot >> /usr/ports/mail/xmailbox >> /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-futurama >> /usr/ports/science/gromacs >> /usr/ports/security/chaosreader >> /usr/ports/www/fcgi >> /usr/ports/www/fcgiwrap >> /usr/ports/x11/grabc >> /usr/ports/x11/xdialog >> /usr/ports/x11/xtrlock >> /usr/ports/x11-fm/catseye-fm >> /usr/ports/x11-fonts/cyberbit-ttfonts >> /usr/ports/x11-servers/Xfstt >> >> Please remove my e-mail address and mirror URL from the relevant >> Makefiles. >> > > Maybe you could elaborate a bit more what you find so annoying about running "poudriere testport origin" before doing "svn commit" that you are willing to drop port maintainership over it? > > -m > Especially since "update ports" means "commit to ports" and Fonz doesn't have commit privileges. It wasn't even directed at maintainers (although I would say that maintainers that don't test their updates aren't doing good work and relying on a committer to catch obvious mistakes). I like Fonz a lot but that is pure drama queen stuff right there. "Check your work, please". "I quit". Ok. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus