From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 12 00:55:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55F61065670 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:55:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com [209.85.218.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9FC8FC17 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so637014bwz.3 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:55:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=xxTt1Lk0KEov1T4gvrGOFh9Lg4GAzfNwhqBwB5vEYwI=; b=fP25O/8cTMoQdKgbzoMHpOwhDLr65l/jVgSIjxbS8J6fUdy16FMzbTKXlQ+sFvsiny D3IBwB/JbJuverUJSGmWADn1mSe+7DdnlUjtD1BBfNOVnvXxOhxRza580P9gGNiqKy/d wixpjCRHjx/VQQqoepP9AbtrNfyWTWHbKLimI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=VVnBOBF5tlalHTaU2FlPTXqSn2qzdBPqPA0UdTRk6p590RbQ6pAUfkqVqGaL9P+HUO wZEpfCAbPE8P7tKspi8hhKwkkS957p007oe6BKY6nfIIND7RsViKO5hrs7F+vxYIHBPG ZNqEEWr9Wj9Co3CkOvJA6+QsQhM11MqqnsERw= Received: by 10.204.9.131 with SMTP id l3mr1235663bkl.128.1268355354204; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:55:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.11.61] (197.214.32.202.bf.2iij.net [202.32.214.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a11sm2470966bkc.15.2010.03.11.16.55.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:55:52 -0800 (PST) Sender: Rui Paulo Message-Id: <1B195022-0EAB-4997-854F-CF38163C795E@freebsd.org> From: Rui Paulo To: batcilla itself In-Reply-To: <6c36ec371003111132h15742440k7917ad1d1e3032df@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:55:46 +0900 References: <6c36ec371002101424n28589b53l7d7a14660c04ce08@mail.gmail.com> <4B741996.8030801@freebsd.org> <6c36ec371003111132h15742440k7917ad1d1e3032df@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TDMA link cannot pass data X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:55:56 -0000 On 12 Mar 2010, at 04:32, batcilla itself wrote: > 2010/2/11 Rui Paulo >> >> On 10/02/2010 22:24, batcilla itself wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 3 Jan 2010, at 12:23, Kim Culhan wrote: >>> >>> [skip...] >>> >>>> This is odd. What happens without the bridge? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rui Paulo >>> >>> I guess without the bridge ping going w/o any problem. >>> >>> I also tried couple of configs with wlan in different wlanmode, >>> hostap etc: >>> it is precisely same as Kim wrote. In case of use routed >>> connection it >>> work just fine. >>> In case of: >>> [host1]----(eth===bridge0===gif)---- >>> wlan0=====wirelesslink=====wlan0---(gif===bridge0===eth)----[host2] >>> it is works and host1 can ping host2. >>> in case of >>> [host1]----(eth===bridge0===wlan0)----====wirelesslink====----- >>> (wlan0===bridge0===etc)---[host2] >>> broadcast packets including arp can go through bridge, other packets >>> miss after leaving wlan in direction of wirelesslink. >>> >>> I seen this on very recent 8-STABLE. (FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #1: Thu Feb >>> 4 23:03:37 EET 2010) >>> >>> Can it be somehow linked with experimental bridging support for a >>> mesh? >>> May be there is some sysctl need to be set in non-default value. >>> >>> I also repeat same test with 9-CURRENT ( FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Thu >>> Feb 4 16:16:02 UTC 2010 ). >>> >>> This is really odd... >> >> I think this is more likely related to ARP and routing table >> issues. I asked the submitter to use p5-SVN-Bisect in order to find >> the revision that broke. > > > Is there any progress/revision found? I have a good test-place: 2 > links outdoor with full control from ethernet side and on-my-table > setup also, so I can test almost instantly. Also have a pair of SR71a > (3x3 MIMO .11n) - also can test with TDMA or w/o it. > Just call. No time yet to play with this. Sorry. -- Rui Paulo