Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 17:15:24 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removal of netns Message-ID: <20030305011524.AE7422A89E@canning.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303041453430.42494-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: > I thought nwfs used it? Nope. But actually looking at the code would have told you that. Remember, we're talking about the Xerox networking suite here. It's not like its a widely deployed protocol or something important. > > On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Tim Robbins wrote: > > > Is there a compelling reason why I shouldn't remove netns? That is, does > > it serve a purpose now that it could not serve if it was moved to the > > Attic? > > > > > > Tim > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030305011524.AE7422A89E>