From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 14 00:27:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9C1106564A for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:27:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@freebsd.org) Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (hen.cisco.com [64.102.19.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4048FC0C for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:27:30 +0000 (UTC) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1E0RT4V013807; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:27:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from jclarke-mac.local (jclarke-pc.cisco.com [172.18.254.236]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1E0RRmf013679; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:27:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4D5876EF.4060405@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:27:27 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Huff References: <19800.29280.574271.80477@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <19800.29280.574271.80477@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gtk function declaration not prototyped? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:27:31 -0000 On 2/13/11 7:08 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > > Hello: > For a 'C' project I'm owrking on, for various reasons the > warning level has been turned _way_ up. > As a resuly, I see this: > > /usr/local/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtkitemfactory.h:47: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype > > Is this deliberate? Yes. Check the comments in the header. The syntax is done to maintain backward compatibility. > If so, is there a work-around other than lowering the warning > level? You can keep the warning level high, just don't use -Werror. Joe > If not, is it reasonable to expect a prompt fix? > > Respectfully, > > > Robert Huff > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome