Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:40:11 +0100
From:      Andreas Tobler <andreast@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r228955 - head/include
Message-ID:  <4EFCB40B.5090405@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20111229183213.GK1895@hoeg.nl>
References:  <201112291441.pBTEfI8l060127@svn.freebsd.org> <4EFCA6A6.6080103@FreeBSD.org> <20111229183213.GK1895@hoeg.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Ed,

On 29.12.11 19:32, Ed Schouten wrote:

> * Andreas Tobler<andreast@FreeBSD.org>, 20111229 18:43:
>> Thank you Ed! gcc-4.6 bootstrap successful.
>
> But it seems GCC 4.7 is still broken. I am not planning to fix that,
> because it's a shortcoming of GCC. As soon as the GNU folks implement
> C++11 [[noreturn]], it should work again.

Yep, gcc-trunk is still broken. I help(ed) myself with a 
!defined(__GNUC__) with this I can continue hacking on trunk...

Well, I possibly do not understand all/everything regarding this 
[[noreturn]]. But I do not see an activity in this direction on the gcc 
side.
They implemented the _Noreturn for STDC but the double-square-bracket 
notation for noreturn C++ I do not see. As said, I might simply do not 
see it.

Thanks again,
Andreas




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EFCB40B.5090405>