From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 23 19:07:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4ADF16A420; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Received: from kozubik.com (kozubik.com [69.43.165.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D4D43D6D; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:07:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Received: from kozubik.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kozubik.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2NJ7WpB095304; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:07:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Received: from localhost (john@localhost) by kozubik.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k2NJ7WI7095301; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:07:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:07:32 -0800 (PST) From: John Kozubik To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20060323185717.GA85305@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20060323110458.W55763@kozubik.com> References: <20060320224313.O55763@kozubik.com> <20060323183414.GA84775@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060323103850.S55763@kozubik.com> <20060323185717.GA85305@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 02:59:07 +0000 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, jroberson@chesapeake.net, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, tegge@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS2 Snapshots in 6.1-Beta4 - Confirmed Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:07:51 -0000 Kris, et al., On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > I ran a (completion of) your script in a loop for about 24 hours and > > > it didn't deadlock. This may be because there was a second set of > > > fixes that was merged in to 6.x a day or two ago. Are you able to > > > confirm whether they indeed fixed this problem? > > > > What ratio of snapshots / rms did you run ? > > 3/3, as you suggested. Ok. If you have code that is newer than the 6.1-BETA4 ISO that I downloaded to do my tests with, then perhaps it is fixed. Could you try it one more time, though, with: 8 snapshots / 4 rms ? If it lives through that, doing big rms of source trees on the FS that is snapshotted (8 times), then I guess it is fixed. Thanks. ----- John Kozubik - john@kozubik.com - http://www.kozubik.com