From owner-cvs-all  Sat Aug 15 22:47:00 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all>
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA03723
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 22:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all)
Received: from ns11.rim.or.jp (ns11.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.230])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA03717;
          Sat, 15 Aug 1998 22:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from masafumi@aslm.rim.or.jp)
Received: from rayearth.rim.or.jp (rayearth.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.242]) by ns11.rim.or.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl2-ns11/RIMNET-2) with ESMTP
	id OAA28562; Sun, 16 Aug 1998 14:46:24 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by rayearth.rim.or.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl2-uucp1/RIMNET) with UUCP
	id OAA24309; Sun, 16 Aug 1998 14:46:24 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.aslm.rim.or.jp (8.9.1/3.5Wpl3-SMTP) with ESMTP id OAA07244; Sun, 16 Aug 1998 14:38:54 +0900 (JST)
To: mph@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: max@wide.ad.jp
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc/diction - Imported sources
From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <max@wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 4 Aug 1998 10:04:18 -0700 (PDT)"
	<199808041704.KAA04851@freefall.freebsd.org>
References: <199808041704.KAA04851@freefall.freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.92.4 on Emacs 20.2 / Mule 3.0 (MOMIJINOGA)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <19980816143853E.masafumi@aslm.rim.or.jp>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 14:38:53 +0900
X-Dispatcher: imput version 971024
Lines: 14
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

     > mph         1998/08/04 10:04:18 PDT
     > ports/misc/diction - Imported sources
     > Update of /home/ncvs/ports/misc/diction
     > In directory freefall.freebsd.org:/d/users/mph/diction
  
     > Log Message:
     > Import of GNU diction and style, for finding possible errors in
     > text and evaluating its readability.

Above description gives me an impression that this port belongs to the
textproc category instead.

     Cheers,
Max