From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 19 05:00:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A369316A4CE for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 05:00:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C31A43D77 for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 05:00:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4J50Njc021738 for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 05:00:23 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j4J50NxL021737; Thu, 19 May 2005 05:00:23 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 05:00:23 GMT Message-Id: <200505190500.j4J50NxL021737@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: David Adam Subject: Re: docs/81199: handbook/ipfw does not mention gateway_enable in rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Adam List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 05:00:27 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/81199; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Adam To: Rong-En Fan Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/81199: handbook/ipfw does not mention gateway_enable in rc.conf Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 12:53:46 +0800 (WST) On Wed, 18 May 2005, Rong-En Fan wrote: > >Description: > Handbook 24.5 and 24.6 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls-ipf.html > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls-ipfw.html > > in 24.6, which contains ipfw/natd, and it does not explicitly mention > gateway_enable="YES" if you are going to use private ip. While 24.5.3 > (section about ipf) does it. > > >Fix: > Add similar things in 24.5.3 to 24.6.3. The following patch should cover it. ----- firewalls.chapter.81199.patch begins here ----- --- firewalls.chapter.orig 2005-05-08 22:15:43.000000000 +0800 +++ firewalls.chapter.1 2005-05-19 12:49:45.000000000 +0800 @@ -2265,6 +2265,11 @@ net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit=5 + + If you are using NAT, enable IP forwarding: + + gateway_enable="YES" + ----- firewalls.chapter.81199.patch ends here ----- Can Rong-En or someone else using IPFW to do NAT confirm that this is required before it gets checked in, please? (I assume there are still some people out there who do...) David Adam zanchey@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au