From owner-cvs-all Fri Aug 28 18:16:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA20295 for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 18:16:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA20275 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 18:15:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@backplane.com) Received: (dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.8.8/8.6.5) id SAA21043; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 18:15:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 18:15:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199808290115.SAA21043@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make.conf Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk :> a make.conf.local. I would like to do that and go on to other more : :The make.conf.local idea *I* personally have no objection to, though :removing make.conf as you were suggesting before is probably Not On. :Bruce will and probably did object to that one, but then Bruce objects WOA!! READ THE THREAD!!!! Brian Cully is the one who suggested moving make.conf to a man page, NOT ME!! My original commit was to simply tag on a make.conf.local check onto the end of make.conf, and when it was pointed out that it would be better placed in sys.mk, I said 'fine'. Personally, I would rather just stick it in sys.mk and be done with it, especially since there seems to be more resistance to Brian's idea then to even the original make.conf .include of make.conf.local. -Matt :to everything and thus can usually be ignored in these areas since :it's sort of like the U.S. Government stamping everything "Top Secret" :back in the 80's - you do something too often and the very concept :loses a lot of its meaning. :-) : :- Jordan : : Matthew Dillon Engineering, HiWay Technologies, Inc. & BEST Internet Communications (Please include original email in any response)