From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 11:00:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D981B37B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 11:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-131.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCD443F93 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 11:00:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h4KI06qN002461; Tue, 20 May 2003 11:00:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.5/Submit) id h4KI04fZ002460; Tue, 20 May 2003 11:00:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 11:00:04 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Jon Lido Message-ID: <20030520180004.GA2372@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Jon Lido , Morten Rodal , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <200305201025.30296.jlido@goof.com> <20030520152856.GA530@atlantis.rodal.no> <200305201216.10964.jlido@goof.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200305201216.10964.jlido@goof.com> cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc/libm floating-point bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 18:00:09 -0000 On Tue, May 20, 2003, Jon Lido wrote: > Well, I do have a P4, and had built everything with -march=pentium4. However, > rebuilding the kernel and modules with -march=pentium3 produces the same > results. This isn't a kernel problem, so you need to rebuild libm and libc without -march=pentium4. You really don't want to be using the Pentium 4 optimizations in gcc 3.2 anyway; the generated code is generally slower. gcc 3.3 has fixes for a number of the bugs, but I don't know about the performance problems.