From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 14 22:55:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E6216A400 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 22:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michel@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E735A43D45 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 22:55:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michel@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.6/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k4EMtNE2038930 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 00:55:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 165 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A369FD6A for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 00:55:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 096A533; Mon, 15 May 2006 00:55:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 00:55:22 +0200 From: Michel Talon To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060514225521.GA34890@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mail-Followup-To: Michel Talon , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.165]); Mon, 15 May 2006 00:55:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 4467B55B.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Subject: Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 22:55:25 -0000 > Are you running rpc.lockd? I've had very bad luck with it since > sometime in the 5.x series... especially with it interoperating with > Solaris. I submitted a PR on it, but it's apparently broken in about X > ways. If possible, I would suggest living without rpc.lockd for now (if > you're currently living with it that is) On the contrary NFS problems interoperating with Linux have been cleared for me since upgrading Linux to Fedora Core 5 and FreeBSD to 6.1. In particular rpc.lockd works, everything is OK, performance is fine. I had very bad problems in the past, when we were running Fedora Core 3. -- Michel TALON