From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 13:23:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEE016A4BF for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 13:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.seekingfire.com (coyote.seekingfire.com [24.72.10.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989EF43FBF for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 13:23:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: from blues.seekingfire.prv (blues.seekingfire.prv [192.168.23.211]) by mail.seekingfire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8C756 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 14:23:09 -0600 (CST) Received: (from tillman@localhost) by blues.seekingfire.prv (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h82KN9404976 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 14:23:09 -0600 Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 14:23:09 -0600 From: Tillman Hodgson To: FreeBSD-Questions Message-ID: <20030902142309.K21559@seekingfire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i X-Urban-Legend: There is lots of hidden information in headers Subject: How to confirm the options for an NFS mount? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 20:23:11 -0000 Howdy, How does one confirm that the options listed in /etc/fstab for an NFS mount are actually in place? For example, here's the abbreviated outpout of `mount`: athena:/usr/obj on /usr/obj (nfs, read-only) athena:/usr/src on /usr/src (nfs, read-only) athena:/usr/ports on /usr/ports (nfs) That tells me whether or not the 'ro' flag is used, but doesn't tell me whether any of the other flags (such as 'soft', '-w' and '-r') actualyl in effect. -T -- Often people attempt to live their lives backwards; they try to /have/ more things, or more money, in order to /do/ more of what they want, so they will /be/ happier. The way it actually works is the reverse. You must first /be/ who you really are, then, /do/ what you need to do, in order to /have/ what you want. Margaret Young