From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 13:42:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48253106566B for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D558FC0C for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2012 08:13:09 -0500 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BPV40165; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:13:09 -0500 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2012 08:13:09 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20306.6373.473180.224900@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:13:09 -0500 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4F51D916.5090301@gmail.com> References: <4F51D916.5090301@gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: SeaMonkey eats the CPU as of r232144 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:42:02 -0000 deeptech71@gmail.com writes: > I always had the impression that using an older world with a more > recent kernel is almost always supported, and the exceptional > cases are noted in the UPDATING file, as a quote shows: "User > utilities using SIOCAIFADDR, SIOCAIFADDR_IN6, e.g. ifconfig(8), > need to be recompiled.". One wonders where you got this impression, because I have always had pretty much the opposite - or at least the "correct operation where running world not matched to running kernel is presumed unlikely until proven otherwise" version. (Yes, it often works ... except when it doesn't.) Respectfully, Robert Huff