From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Sep 14 18:51:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AB437B423; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 18:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA55342; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 18:51:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 18:51:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Forrest Aldrich Cc: max@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: delegate-6.1.16 In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20000914213155.00b5cb60@64.20.73.233> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > Are these changes extensive, or would some patches suffice? (ie: has > someone performed some groundwork mods). Quite extensive :-( > Apart from this, might you recommend another proxy solution that might > suffice? I've attempted (and failed, due to odd documentation) to work > with ipfw port forwarding. What I'm wanting to do is to pass POP3 (and > perhaps IMAP, etc) access on to a hidden/internal server, from a bastion host. I'm not really sure. Perhaps the fwtk port will do what you need. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message