From owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Tue Oct 11 17:19:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370F8C0D3A0 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:19:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [IPv6:2a01:4f8:162:1127::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.codepro.be", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04911A3F for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:19:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.0.2.164] (ptr-2hj4tbph7h3f7lvq61pgulzlb.ip6.access.telenet.be [IPv6:2a02:1811:2419:4e02:2575:5452:579f:956f]) (Authenticated sender: kp) by venus.codepro.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AA4E15C53; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:19:56 +0200 (CEST) From: "Kristof Provost" To: "Kamil Choudhury" Cc: "freebsd-pf@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Slow NAT on 10.3-RELEASE Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 16:47:47 +0200 Message-ID: <5D92FF1D-F24C-465D-9502-B6D9A7276628@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6057) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:19:59 -0000 On 11 Oct 2016, at 10:34, Kamil Choudhury wrote: > I've seen some mention of checksum issues on NAT limiting performance, > but that > seems to have been fixed as of 10.2 in an errata. Have I stumbled upon > an actual > problem, or have I misconfigured something? > It’s worth trying the workaround (i.e. disable all checksum offloading on your interfaces). I’ve had at least one bug report indicating that the checksum patch is not 100% correct, but I’ve not had the time to investigate that in-depth. What virtualisation system are you using? Regards, Kristof