From owner-freebsd-current Mon Aug 26 09:38:56 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA23577 for current-outgoing; Mon, 26 Aug 1996 09:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (spinner.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA23572; Mon, 26 Aug 1996 09:38:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.DIALix.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA22795; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:38:38 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: <199608261638.AAA22795@spinner.DIALix.COM> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96 To: current@freebsd.org cc: committers@freebsd.org Subject: CTM users take note! Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:38:37 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk We have some bigish imports on the drawing board (gcc-2.7.2.1, ncurses, nvi, etc) that might cause the people getting ctm deltas MAILED to them some pain. It's been suggested that the exising ctm-{src,cvs,ports}-cur mailing lists be converted to "slow mailout" and a seperate set of new "fast, all at once" lists be started. Gary Palmer has written a nice slow-delta-mailout backend for the ctm delta generator which should do the job nicely. It defaults to 2 100K chunks per hour, that's 2MB per 10 hours. Is this too much? Too little? The current configuration won't mail out a delta that's more than 3MB, perhaps lowering that would be an alternative. Does anybody have particularly strong feelings about the parameters for this? (Watch the reply address, this is crossposted..) -Peter