Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 20:02:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> To: Scott Blachowicz <scott@statsci.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org>, andreas@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/xv Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95.960924195736.4358B-100000@maryann.eng.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <m0v5eqN-0003wxC@main.statsci.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 24 Sep 1996, Scott Blachowicz wrote: > "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> wrote: > > > > I can change bsd.port.mk to keep the list of ports actually built > > > because of dependencies, but is this really worth it? > > > > Naw, I'd say just chain the clean. This seems like one of those religious issues, that is bound to completely irritate everyone, no matter how you do it. Why can't we have clean, and squeeky-clean? (No, I can't make up a better name, I'm lousy at that). I would choose to clean thoroughly myself, usually, but it wouldn't be that awful hard to have two clean targets, would it? That way we would stand at least a chance of making most folks happy, and we could avoid extreme and hard to maintain overcomplicated cleaning algorithms, that would leave everyone confused. > Scott Blachowicz Ph: 206/283-8802x240 Mathsoft (Data Analysis Products Div) > 1700 Westlake Ave N #500 > scott@statsci.com Seattle, WA USA 98109 > Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org > > > ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and n3lxx, both FreeBSD (301) 220-2114 | version 2.2 current -- and great FUN! ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.95.960924195736.4358B-100000>