From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 25 08:55:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0628416A4CE for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:55:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9A743D4C for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:55:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 14833 invoked by uid 89); 25 Nov 2004 08:58:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 25 Nov 2004 08:58:14 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E19E91183E; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:55:01 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:55:00 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: ronvdaal Message-ID: <20041125105500.7b18d54d@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20041125092441.M88351@zarathustra.linux666.com> References: <20041125092441.M88351@zarathustra.linux666.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inconsistent INDEX on cvs server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:55:06 -0000 On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:29:37 +0100 (CET) ronvdaal wrote: [... ] > Could it be that something is broken in the ports index? It seems that > some port "deepforest" depends on a port in the x11-toolkits group. > I don't cvsup the x11-toolkits or other x11 groups on these machines > because they are webservers not X systems. [ ... ] > ******************************************************************** > Before reporting this error, verify that you are running a supported > version of FreeBSD (see http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/) and that you > have a complete and up-to-date ports collection. (INDEX builds are > not supported with partial or out-of-date ports collections -- in > particular, if you are using cvsup, you must cvsup the "ports-all" > collection, and have no "refuse" files.) Is there something you don't understand in "not supported", "complete", etc. above ? You sent the answer to your question. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"