Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 06:54:31 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@FreeBSD.org> To: Mikhail T. <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 474, Issue 7 Message-ID: <4FE2FD67.3040407@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FE2F839.9060904@aldan.algebra.com> References: <20120621083054.90E051065692@hub.freebsd.org> <4FE2F839.9060904@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/21/12 6:32 AM, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 21.06.2012 04:30, freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org wrote: >> portname: x11/etoile >> description: Metaport for Etoile desktop >> maintainer:ports@FreeBSD.org ^^^^^^^^ >> deprecated because: API no longer supported >> expiration date: 2012-07-20 >> build errors: none. >> overview:http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=x11&portname=etoile >> > The entire etoile is being ripped out for a reason of "API no longer > supported"... Could the powers that be elaborate, what this means, > please? Which API? > > The version in ports is 0.4.1. Visiting the project's web-site > (http://www.etoile-project.org/) shows version 0.4.2 available since > April. Thanks! > you are more then welcome to adopt them. without anyone maintaining them (ports@ is a default, means no maintainer, old maintainer dropped it) There won't be anyone updating these either. Do you use it? Do you need it? grab maintainership and update away. Extremely important to you commercially? but don't have the time to maintain it? some readers of this group can be bribed by paypal or amazon gift lists ,, (no, not me) if nobody maintains a port, eventually, it gets into disrepair. and then gets deleted. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FE2FD67.3040407>