From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 17 21:03:14 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBA916A402;
	Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:03:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from cchin@ack.Berkeley.EDU)
Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (malcolm.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.206.239])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4431C43D48;
	Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:03:14 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from cchin@ack.Berkeley.EDU)
Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k3HL3Eqi002568
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from cchin@ack.Berkeley.EDU)
Received: from localhost (cchin@localhost)
	by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.6/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id
	k3HL3DrO002565; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from cchin@ack.Berkeley.EDU)
X-Authentication-Warning: malcolm.berkeley.edu: cchin owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christopher Chin <cchin@ack.Berkeley.EDU>
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200604171950.k3HJo0TA076716@freefall.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20060417135646.J91418@malcolm.berkeley.edu>
References: <200604171950.k3HJo0TA076716@freefall.freebsd.org>
X-Java-Level: single soy latte
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6
	(malcolm.berkeley.edu [127.0.0.1]);
	Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/95956: 128-bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:03:14 -0000

Today at 19:50 (-0000), Mark Linimon wrote:

> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:50:00 GMT
> From: Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org>
> To: cchin@ack.Berkeley.EDU, linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
> Subject: Re: bin/95956: 128-bit
> 
> Synopsis: 128-bit
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: linimon
> State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 17 19:49:11 UTC 2006
> State-Changed-Why:
> The 108-bit key is understood to be the correct behavior.


Hmmm...  turns out that a better answer would have been
for me to (re-)read the 6-0 Release Notes...
particularly section 2.2.2.2. Network Interface Support.

Apparently: "Note in particular that WEP now requires
the wlan_wep module to be loaded (or compiled) into the
kernel."

All fine and good... but I'd be surprised if others
don't trip on this as well when 6.x gets more usage.

Oh...  Sorry about the lame subject line.  I hit the 
submit button before going back and "fixing" the Subject.


Thanks,
  - Christopher

======================