Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Feb 1997 18:37:10 -0800 (PST)
From:      Jonathan Mini <mini@micron.efn.org>
To:        Peter Mutsaers <plm@xs4all.nl>
Cc:        Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM>, emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Status report of vm86/dos emulation
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.970224183042.15699D-100000@micron.efn.org>
In-Reply-To: <199702242120.WAA05181@plm.xs4all.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 24 Feb 1997, Peter Mutsaers wrote:

> >> On Sun, 23 Feb 1997 17:40:53 -0800, Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM> said:
> 
>     SEF> P.S.  As an aside, I've (sadly) come to the conclusion that
>     SEF> dos emulation is essentially worthless.  WINE or Wabi (or
>     SEF> similar) is the way to go, it seems.  Oh, you could probably
>     SEF> use a DOS emulator to do the installation, and having a
>     SEF> decent DOS emulator built into WINE or Wabi (or similar) is
>     SEF> probably a really good idea... but there's not a lot that you
>     SEF> get with a pure DOS emulator, which is what we currently
>     SEF> have.  Maybe if/when we get DOSEMU working, we may have more
>     SEF> luck.  SEF
> 
> For some of us it is really useful. My main reason to switch to
> DOS/Windows is an electroninc banking application under DOS. It would
> be great if I could run it under FreeBSD.

I use (on a day to day basis) FreeBSD in conjunction with Watcom C/C++. 
This seems evil, and it is, but I happen to use FreeBSD all of the time, 
and I am developing a 32-bit DOS-based app under Watcom C/C++ (I spent 
the well-worth-it money to get DOS/4GW and a kick ass compiler, djgpp -- 
though free -- doesn't do half of what I need, and Watcom's optimization 
is not broken, unlike gcc's. This is important in my line of work) 
  Wine's emulation, although great for windows apps, won't help me a bit 
for my _DOS BASED_ compiler/debugger suit. Even though Watcom has made a 
Windows GUI, it is really only a shoddy GUI pipe in front of a few 
command line processes. (i'm serious) 
  If any of you have ever tried using make under DOS, you'll know my 
sorrows. Not to mention the fact that cvs is a UNIX thing. The ability to 
just run my compiler and/or debugger from FreeBSD is a tremendous 
improvement. (Watcom's debugging supports everything in god's creation, 
even TCP/IP. (as if TCP/IP were this wierd unheard of standard, nobody 
else seems to support it)

  just because GUI's look cool, doesn't mean that there aren't any 
up-to-date powerful utilities that really only come in DOS-binary form. 
Right now, my DOS machine exists solely for my compiler and Photoshop. 
With wine i hope to one day run Photoshop, and with doscmd I hope to one 
day run my DOS/4GW compiler. =)

Jonathan Mini (j_mini@efn.org)

... bleakness ... desolation ... plastic forks ...




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970224183042.15699D-100000>