From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 22 01:02:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73109106566B for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:02:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marco@tols.org) Received: from tols.org (goofy.tols.org [83.163.60.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73848FC17 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from donald.home.tols.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by donald.home.tols.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAM0OUid001800 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:24:30 GMT (envelope-from marco@donald.home.tols.org) Received: (from marco@localhost) by donald.home.tols.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAM0OUiw001799 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:24:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marco) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:24:30 +0100 From: Marco van Tol To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091122002430.GB934@donald.home.tols.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <4B066B13.1070006@freebsd.org> <4b07ac59.A2Afaf4X0IZlrgGU%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: 7.2 dies in zfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:02:39 -0000 On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 06:16:04PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > >> imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you > >> do not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and > >> burn some eye of newt. > > ROFL! > > As with any open-source project, I suppose it will be ready > > when it is ready. At least it hasn't been made the default. > > yep. i demand a full refund! :) > > my concern is the innocent admin putting something critical on zfs in > 8.0 when it is called stable and production. this isn't linux. Well, to be honest, running something critical on a release candidate is interesting enough as it is right? :-) Just my $0.02 Marco van Tol -- The first step to better times is to imagine them. - www.chinese-fortune-cookie.com