Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:24:30 +0100 From: Marco van Tol <marco@tols.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.2 dies in zfs Message-ID: <20091122002430.GB934@donald.home.tols.org> In-Reply-To: <m24oooi6gb.wl%randy@psg.com> References: <m2skcajavv.wl%randy@psg.com> <m2r5ruja6v.wl%randy@psg.com> <4B066B13.1070006@freebsd.org> <m2bpiwitz7.wl%randy@psg.com> <4b07ac59.A2Afaf4X0IZlrgGU%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <m24oooi6gb.wl%randy@psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 06:16:04PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > >> imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you > >> do not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and > >> burn some eye of newt. > > ROFL! > > As with any open-source project, I suppose it will be ready > > when it is ready. At least it hasn't been made the default. > > yep. i demand a full refund! :) > > my concern is the innocent admin putting something critical on zfs in > 8.0 when it is called stable and production. this isn't linux. Well, to be honest, running something critical on a release candidate is interesting enough as it is right? :-) Just my $0.02 Marco van Tol -- The first step to better times is to imagine them. - www.chinese-fortune-cookie.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091122002430.GB934>