From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct  1 10:42:31 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FF516A4BF
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed,  1 Oct 2003 10:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from underfoot.windborne.net (underfoot.windborne.net
	[66.100.81.20])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9860D44001
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  1 Oct 2003 10:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from branson@windborne.net)
Received: by underfoot.windborne.net (Postfix, from userid 10652)
	id 76AFA1324A; Wed,  1 Oct 2003 13:42:26 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 13:42:26 -0400
From: Branson Matheson <branson@windborne.net>
To: sysadmin@alexdupre.com
Message-ID: <20031001134226.A99669@underfoot.windborne.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
cc: gjp@bsdnet.org
cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
cc: moon@wistful.net
Subject: PHP4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Branson Matheson <branson@windborne.net>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 17:42:31 -0000

 Hey, I have two issues for ya:

  - in the current port CVS'd as of last night..  you're missing the define
    for OPENSSLBASE in the Makefile..  so it will not build properly with
    out this being set if OPENSSL is selected from the menu.

  - As a suggestion it may be more proper to mark "Release Canidates" as
    such in the ports tree.  Much in the same way the nessus port has
    nessus ..  and then nessus-devel.  That way people aren't installing
    bleeding edge software off the cuff. 

 Thanks!

  -branson