From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Aug 31 15: 7:17 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA1737B400
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net (flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.232])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79F143E65
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com)
Received: from pool0248.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.192.248] helo=mindspring.com)
	by flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 17lGOZ-0006Pm-00; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:07:07 -0700
Message-ID: <3D713DD0.8FFA608A@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:06:08 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Cc: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>,
	Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.1 / streambuf.h broken with "using namespace std;"
References: <20020828021006.D1412@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <3D6C1F76.30B458A5@mindspring.com> <20020828063614.GA88426@dragon.nuxi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:55:18PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > In general, though, the answer is that "3.1 sucks and 2.9x
> > does not".  8-).
> 
> Feh.  3.1's optimizer is less buggy in my experience.
> 
> > Use at least GCC 3.2, if you feel compelled to use a buggy
> > non-maintenance release level GCC; alternately, wait for 3.3.
> 
> What in the world are you trying to say??
> "non-maintenance release"???  Why do you think 3.2 is buggy??

Because rather than leaving it alone for a while, they are already
planning a 3.3.  8-).

And comments on this list to that effect.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message