From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 21 23:50:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7C137B437 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 23:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D7A43FCB for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 23:50:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5M6oHUp052384 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 23:50:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5M6oHqi052383; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 23:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 23:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200306220650.h5M6oHqi052383@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: kern/51110: halt -p doesn't if apm not enabled. X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "M. Warner Losh" List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 06:50:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/51110; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "M. Warner Losh" To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, alarson@switchanddata.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/51110: halt -p doesn't if apm not enabled. Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 00:43:40 -0600 Personally I don't think the current behavior is a bug and that this patch introduce a bug. However, it is an oft-requested 'bug' so the folks that want it likely out-number the folks that are purists. This is safe because apm is always initialized when the driver attaches.