From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 15 09:13:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A274106567C for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41E48FC16 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:13:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8505E46B53; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:13:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:13:19 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Florian Smeets In-Reply-To: <4A5D9C51.7070708@kasimir.com> Message-ID: References: <05461E04E6BD4477A879553178599F6E@adnote989> <8026EC1942CE4C128F168BBBFD987B27@adnote989> <4A5D9C51.7070708@kasimir.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Luiz Otavio O Souza , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Rebuild all network-related kernel modules on 8-current due to vnet allocator change X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:13:20 -0000 On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Florian Smeets wrote: >>>> (hand transcribed - i've just an usb keyboard here) >>>> >>>> My kernel don't have any VIMAGE options. >>>> >>>> The system is working flawless before the upgrade. >>>> >>>> If you need any/more information about this, just let me know. >>> >>> I've just commented out the panic() in link_elf_obj.c and now i'm able to >>> create vlans again. >> >> This assertion may well be too conservative -- is there any chance you have >> a kernel built with the DTrace CTF support? It may be using progbits, in >> which case removing the assertion is the right solution. I'll test this >> hypothesis. > > i'm also seeing this panic, it happens when zfs.ko is loaded in my case. I > don't have anything DTrace CTF related in my kernel. Hmm. Then we should just remove the assertion and debug it later. I'll get it in the tree shortly. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge