From owner-svn-src-user@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 6 23:49:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-user@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0E1348 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 23:49:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56668FC14 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 23:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55386 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2012 01:24:49 -0000 Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Nov 2012 01:24:49 -0000 Message-ID: <5099A201.8060103@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:49:21 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luigi Rizzo Subject: Re: svn commit: r242670 - user/andre/tcp_workqueue/sys/dev/e1000 References: <201211061954.qA6JsOP3038450@svn.freebsd.org> <20121106220952.GA32652@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20121107000707.GB32652@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <20121107000707.GB32652@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel , svn-src-user@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-user@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the experimental " user" src tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:49:28 -0000 On 07.11.2012 01:07, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:07:39PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: >> Its his own branch :) > > true, and i totally missed this important detail :) It's my playground and I'm trying out the right approach. > But i do hope the removal lands into HEAD so i'd prefer that > device drivers be left unchanged when this happens. Yes. I'll commit the change as you suggested. We can discuss actual removal of code when we have a firm, working and proven alternative. -- Andre