From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 22 01:21:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA05686 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 22 May 1998 01:21:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hen.scotland.net ([194.247.65.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA05652 for ; Fri, 22 May 1998 01:21:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@timog.prestel.co.uk) Received: from e2c6p22.scotland.net ([148.176.237.86] helo=timog.prestel.co.uk) by hen.scotland.net with esmtp (Exim 1.90 #5) for freebsd-current@freebsd.org id 0ycn4T-0003Pm-00; Fri, 22 May 1998 09:20:58 +0100 Received: (qmail 275 invoked by uid 1002); 22 May 1998 08:12:47 -0000 Message-ID: <19980522091247.36665@timog.prestel.co.uk> Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 09:12:47 +0100 From: Timo Geusch To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Definition of UIO_MAXIOV in Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: Folks, when trying to compile the latest leafnode package on my -current box (cvsupped approx 3 weeks ago), I noticed that the constant UIO_MAXIOV is only defined when KERNEL is defined. Of course I could you kludge it by supplying the constant myself, but I was wondering if there was a reason to define that constant in KERNEL only. If there isn't I'll happily supply the diffs so someone can commit them. Timo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message