From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 23:06:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D4316A4CE for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:06:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C4A43D39 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:06:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B530369A3F; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:06:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:06:02 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Yannack Message-Id: <20041129180602.5b4622a0.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <41ABAAC1.6030901@yahoo.fr> References: <41AB94C9.7040901@yahoo.fr> <1713.207.111.173.106.1101766819.squirrel@webmail.dogbark.com> <41ABAAC1.6030901@yahoo.fr> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.99 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: dkelly@hiwaay.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple NICs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:06:04 -0000 Yannack wrote: > > If > >that results in the route you wish then you might be able to control the > >start order with this in /etc/rc.conf: > > > >network_interfaces="lo0 an0 fxp0" > > > > > And this worked!!!! Hurray :) Thank you so much! > How did you know this could do that??? I checked the man page, and it > really isn't appearant... or is it? He read the source code. The great thing about open source, no matter how badly documented a thing is, you can always read the code. That being said, open source software generally has better documentation than closed source anyway. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com