From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 24 17:53:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC3316A400 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:53:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@herbelot.com) Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FE213C455 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:53:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@herbelot.com) Received: from herbelot.dyndns.org (bne75-4-82-227-159-103.fbx.proxad.net [82.227.159.103]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAF66F2EC for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:53:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from diversion.herbelot.nom (diversion.herbelot.nom [192.168.2.6]) by herbelot.dyndns.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5OHrUgg018929; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:53:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Thierry Herbelot To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:53:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <1182338018.10483.27.camel@bigapple.omnis.ch> <20070623222109.K2020@woozle.rinet.ru> <20070624113148.GA1031@efil.de> In-Reply-To: <20070624113148.GA1031@efil.de> X-Warning: Windows can lose your files X-Op-Sys: Le FriBi de la mort qui tue X-Org: TfH&Co X-MailScanner: Found to be clean MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706241953.23678.thierry@herbelot.com> Cc: Ingo Bormuth Subject: Re: ZFS status now in June? / stable enough for a file server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: thierry@herbelot.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:53:35 -0000 Le Sunday 24 June 2007, Ingo Bormuth a écrit : > On 2007-06-23 22:22, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > Would you please post zfs-related settings you use? Thanks in advance. > > While we're on it I'll post mine too. > > PentiumIII 700Mhz / 256MB RAM / 120GB HD > > -CURRENT as of June, 16th (all but /boot on zfs) > > zfs_load="YES" > vfs.root.mountfrom="zfs:tank/slash" > vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable="1" # performance > vfs.zfs.zil_disable=1 # memory hungry > vfs.zfs.arc_min=8388608 # > vfs.zfs.arc_max=33554433 # > vm.kmem_size=134217728 # quite high ? > kern.maxvnodes=8000 # quite low ? > > No problems so far > - running xorg, firefox, konqueror, gimp together every day > - rebuilding the whole system on zfs > - rsyncing 30GB of data onto the disk, copying it around > - scrubbing the whole pool > > I didn't yet benchmark/optimize for performance thought. > > Comments ? > Hello, I would assume that your performance is compatible with everyday usage. Here, an SMP machine with only src and obj subtrees in zfs is quite slow, even though I have a "large" 320 MB of RAM (but I'm using the straight GENERIC kernel, I did not remove debug-related kernel config options). (I have mostly the same zfs-related setups in /boot/loader.conf as you) TfH