From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jan 9 08:10:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA14108 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 08:10:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [195.1.171.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA14095 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 08:10:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) From: sthaug@nethelp.no Received: (qmail 28069 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Jan 1998 16:10:25 +0000 (GMT) To: joelh@gnu.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adding process ID listing to netstat In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 9 Jan 1998 00:54:13 -0600 (CST)" References: <199801090654.AAA15353@detlev.UUCP> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.28.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 17:10:25 +0100 Message-ID: <28067.884362225@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Would it be useful to others to allow netstat to give the process ID's > that are using sockets? Yes - but aren't you reimplementing lsof? Would it be a good idea to add lsof to the base system instead, like top was added? Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no